Premchand’s Goodan and Dickens Hard Times Essay

on that point is always unremitting impression which b eludes Premchands Goodan and devil Hard time in framework as an entirety. Goodan which was written 1936, in a nutshell travels on the apprehension of a life of a farmer, most signifi chiffoniertly conquest in the hand of division structure. As a novice points out(p) the life of Indian colonization and the farmer seems to be trapped in the shed light on woven by the landlords, moneylenders and police i. e. suggesting treble standard of the capitalistics. twain correspondingly voices tender injustice and problem in the capitalist framework most importantly oppression of the lower pattern by the f number screen. A amateur suggested that both the writers Premchand and Dickens primarily concerns to voicing the social re carcass, consciously trying to draw a repose amidst idealism and realism as a whole.In Hard times which was written in 1854, depicted victorian industrial society, and formulated a spate of radica l critique of industrial England. Siengfried A.Schulz in his book Premchand a western idea provided mainly three proposition move between Hard times and Goodan. In Hard clock 1) Injustice 2) conquering of the poor by the upper frame 3) Attack on the economic theorist, utilitarian. Again, in case of Goodan he proposes 1) deeply intrigued on the Question of Dharma. 2) Oppression of the poor by the rich. 3) Confinement of Premchand to depict the ugly facet of Indian society. If we closely observe there seems to struggle between devil realness world of fancy and world of factualism in Hard Times and world of village and city in Goodan.Goodan presents the life of Hori and his disposition towards religious ritual i. e. Goodan and his unable to renounce the concept of his dharma and his life is doomed cod to his fastening to it. The use of the term Dharma by Premchand gives the impression of a hollow ring suggesting hypocritical too. Hori, hopes that all other would recogn ise and graphicly adhere to a tralatitious code of conduct, notwithstanding his attitude is non reciprocated. This also gives a vibrant see of problem of social hierarchy as a whole.In Hard Times too, the fact lie ideology of the fonts identical Gradgrind and Bounderby can be seen as they argue any kind of fancy or imagination. Dickens represents utilitarian concept of adherence to fact which is dominant in the novel. Again, a critic points out that the marriage between Lusia- Bounderby can be connected with the character of Hori, as he too maries his sr. daughter in marriage to an antiquated man, but the difference according to him is that it is Horis helplessness and misery that drives him towards this decision.Some critic even points out that Premchands livery out of this concept of marriage gives a parallel treatment of marriage as a whole for the western as well as Indian society. by dint of Hori, Premchand reveals the prospect of Indian farmers giving a warning th at life of misery would prevent until there is no change in the go on of Indian farmers towards his environment. Through Gradgrind and Bounderby, Dickens produced his product of representing the contemporary purely materialistic, scientifically bent utilitarian theory.A critic posts Goodan far ahead of Hard Times as it seems more realistic and so Hard Times. There is many instances like the Gradgrinds giving shelter to cissy Jupe, and Horis giving shelter to Siliya which proposed Siegfrieds attempt of convincing that there can be possibility of borrowing ideas by Premchand Form Dickens. Again, there is also a possible analogy between lives of Stephen and Hori as both had extreme faith in life and simplicity and honesty be almost akin to Horis dharma. yet their death brings out exchangeableity as both dies with desires that are not fulfilled. Stephens fall symbolizes the destruction of the working class by industrial upper class and Horis death indicates defeat of the Indian p easant in the face of unsufferable odd. There can be similar parallel between characters like Stephen- Richel and Mehta and Malti in Goodan. Both limited roles, suggesting extra-marital affair.Through these characters Premchand be the immergence of free thinking society. Mehta and Malti exposes Premchands idealism and Dickens depicted realistic form through Stephen and Richel. Premchand posesthe concept of westernization in the cities as well as Malti becomes the target of his satire and satire too in Goodan. At last Tom and Gobar poises two entre of articulation as Tom suggests natural and nasty influence of the fact oriented society.Gobar seems to be burdened by the approach of younger generation. Tom, like Gobar becomes the link betwwn the two worlds. Dickens seems to be hopeful but Premchand exposes his pessimism, his loss of faith in the efficiency of the Indian psyche to overcome change. This voices the two writers concern in reforming society. No motion how far youve g one down the hurt road, turn back. Turkish Proverb